Actor Prakash Raj says his name disappeared from Bengaluru’s electoral rolls during the ongoing SIR in Karnataka. Bengaluru civic officials say that is not what happened. According to them, his name was present when the electoral roll was frozen for the revision exercise, but a Booth Level Officer later found that he no longer lived at the address where he was registered.
Then came another twist.
Raj says officials initially told him that his status had been marked “permanently shifted”, before the wording was changed to simply “shifted” after he raised the issue publicly.
So, was Actor Prakash Raj’s name deleted from the voter list? Or was his old entry marked as shifted because he had moved residence?
The answer is more complicated than a viral headline suggests.
And the distinction matters because Karnataka’s voter-roll revision involves millions of similar cases.
On August 11, Actor Prakash Raj publicly claimed that his name had been deleted from Bengaluru’s electoral rolls during the Special Intensive Revision, or SIR, exercise.
In a video shared on social media, Raj questioned how his name could disappear from the voter list despite his long association with Bengaluru. He pointed out that he had been born and raised in the city, studied there, performed theatre there and had even contested the 2019 Lok Sabha election from Bengaluru Central.
His claim quickly attracted attention because it came during a large-scale voter verification exercise across Karnataka.
The actor's allegation was reported by several news organisations, including The Hindu.
But the Bengaluru civic administration disputed the claim.
According to the Bengaluru Central City Corporation, Raj’s name had not simply disappeared from the electoral roll.
Officials said his name was present at serial number 970, part number 1, in the Shanthinagar Assembly constituency when the electoral roll was frozen for SIR work on June 16.
The subsequent verification, however, produced a different finding.
A Booth Level Officer conducted a house-to-house verification at Raj’s registered address, reportedly Flat No. 266 in Garden Apartment. Officials said the owner told them that Raj had not lived there for around four years and that other tenants were now occupying the premises.
Based on the verification, officials prepared a spot mahazar, or documented site inspection, and the entry was classified as “Shifted.”
The civic body's explanation was that Raj had moved to another address within the Shanthinagar Assembly constituency.
The New Indian Express reported the civic body as saying that the allegation that his name had simply been deleted was not supported by its verification.
This distinction is central to understanding the controversy.
The phrase Name deleted from SIR can suggest that the Election Commission deliberately struck a voter off the electoral roll altogether.
But “shifted” refers to a different situation: officials have determined that the person is no longer ordinarily residing at the address where their electoral entry is registered.
That does not mean the voter has permanently lost the right to vote.
However, the voter does need to ensure that their name is correctly enrolled at their current ordinary residence.
The Election Commission's current guidance is important here. Form 8 is the prescribed form for shifting an existing electoral-roll entry from one residence to another, while Form 6 is used for fresh registration of a new voter. The ECI also says that Form 7 is used for objections or proposed deletion of names from an existing electoral roll.
Election Commission of India — Electoral Roll Forms
ECI — How to Register and Shift Electoral-Roll Entries
There is a nuance in Raj’s case. The Bengaluru civic body reportedly advised that he could seek inclusion at his present address through Form 6. Under the ECI’s standard procedure, however, a voter shifting an existing registration should use Form 8.
So, the exact administrative route available to Raj depends on the status of his existing electoral entry and the stage of the revision process.
The civic body's clarification did not end the controversy.
In a subsequent response, Actor Prakash Raj challenged the Election Commission's version of events.
According to the Times of India, Raj said officials initially informed him that his voter status had been marked “permanently shifted.”
He alleged that after he publicly raised the issue, the wording on the official website changed from “permanently shifted” to “shifted.”
Raj also claimed that officials contacted him after his social-media post began gaining attention and said the matter would be corrected. He said he had call records to support his version of events.
The actor then questioned why the terminology had changed and accused the authorities of misleading the public.
This creates an important unresolved question.
Was the original status actually “permanently shifted,” and if so, why was it subsequently displayed as “shifted”?
At present, Raj has made that allegation, but the publicly available reporting does not independently establish the exact sequence of changes in the underlying electoral database.
That distinction is important.
A balanced report should therefore present Raj's claim as an allegation rather than as an established fact.
The wider SIR in Bengaluru context makes the dispute more significant.
During door-to-door verification, Booth Level Officers are checking whether voters continue to live at the addresses recorded in the electoral rolls. Voters who have moved, are deceased, cannot be found or have duplicate entries can be flagged for further action.
According to data cited from the Karnataka Chief Electoral Officer’s office, 84.31 lakh voters out of around 5.54 crore mapped voters were classified under the ASDDO category during the verification process.
ASDDO refers to voters identified as:
The largest category was “permanently shifted”, accounting for around 51.74 lakh voters.
Another 14.99 lakh were classified as dead, 11.61 lakh as absent and 5.62 lakh as already enrolled or duplicate entries.
The four electoral districts comprising Bengaluru reportedly account for more than half of the statewide ASDDO list.
That puts the SIR in Bengaluru controversy involving Raj into perspective.
His case is high-profile because of his celebrity status. But the underlying question - what happens when a voter is found to have shifted from the registered address - potentially affects millions of ordinary voters.

Img Src : Twitter
The Special Intensive Revision is designed to verify and update electoral rolls through detailed field-level verification.
For voters, however, the process can become confusing when they have moved homes, changed constituencies, been temporarily unavailable during verification or have not yet updated their electoral details.
The Election Commission's voter-services portal currently provides dedicated facilities for the SIR 2026 exercise, including options to search previous SIR records, submit enumeration forms and access voter services.
This is why voters should not assume that an electoral-roll discrepancy automatically means their voting rights have been permanently cancelled.
At the same time, voters should not ignore a missing or incorrect entry either.
The practical question is simple:
Is your name currently present in the electoral roll for the constituency where you ordinarily live?
If the answer is no, the next step is to understand why.
The current dispute also comes against the backdrop of earlier scrutiny of Raj’s voter records.
In a separate matter in 2026, a Bengaluru court dealt with allegations concerning multiple voter registrations involving the actor. Raj appeared before the court and was granted conditional bail.
That case is separate from the present SIR controversy and should not be treated as evidence that his current allegation is either true or false.
What it does explain is why the latest voter-roll dispute has attracted more attention than a routine address-verification case might otherwise receive.
The SIR in Karnataka exercise is a reminder for every voter to verify their electoral-roll status rather than rely solely on an EPIC or voter ID card.
If a voter has shifted residence, the ECI says Form 8 is used to shift an existing electoral-roll entry.
If a person's name is not included in the electoral roll and they need fresh inclusion, Form 6 is used.
For proposed deletion or objections concerning an existing entry, Form 7 is the relevant form.
The ECI also provides an online facility to search electoral rolls and track applications.
ECI Electors — Search Your Name and Update Details
The Name deleted from SIR debate is ultimately bigger than one actor.
Raj says his name was deleted. Bengaluru officials say his old entry was marked “Shifted” after verification showed he no longer lived at the registered address. Raj has subsequently questioned the terminology used in his record and alleged that it was changed after he raised the issue publicly.
Both parts of that story need to be reported.
What is established is that officials found Raj was no longer living at the address where he was registered. What remains disputed is the exact status shown in the system at different points and whether the public explanation accurately reflected what officials initially communicated to him.
The wider numbers show why this matters.
With 51.74 lakh voters classified as permanently shifted during the revision process, the issue extends far beyond the case of a celebrity.
For ordinary voters, the lesson is straightforward: don't wait until an election to discover that your name is missing from the electoral roll.
Check your voter status, verify your current address and, if something is wrong, use the appropriate ECI process to correct it.
The SIR in Bengaluru may have put Actor Prakash Raj's voter record under the spotlight, but the real question is one every voter should be asking:
Is my name still on the electoral roll - and is it listed at the right address?
Everything you need to know
No. The Bengaluru Central City Corporation said his name remained on the roll for Shanthinagar constituency at serial number 970, part number 1, as of June 16, 2026. Officials marked his status as 'Shifted' after finding he no longer lived at his registered address, not deleted.
A Booth Level Officer's house-to-house verification found Raj had permanently moved out of his registered address, No. 266, Garden Apartment. The flat owner reportedly said Raj hadn't lived there for four years, prompting officials to prepare a spot mahazar and mark the entry 'Shifted'.
The civic body said he can re-register at his current residence within Shanthinagar constituency by filing Form 6, the standard form for updating a voter's address on the electoral roll.
Aug 14, 2026
TUI Staff
Aug 13, 2026
TUI Staff
Aug 12, 2026
TUI Staff
Aug 07, 2026
TUI Staff
Aug 14, 2026
TUI Staff
Aug 14, 2026
TUI Staff
Aug 14, 2026
TUI Staff
Aug 14, 2026
TUI Staff
Comments (0)
Be the first to comment!